ME 421L Automatic Control Laboratory

 

 

 

 

 

Laboratory Assignments

Lab1 Handout in PDF Format
Hint: Use the Enlarge Icon in the Acrobat Viewer to see the handout's images in detail

MEG 421L Control Lab #2 Handout

Lab3 Handout in PDF Format
Hint: Use the Enlarge Icon in the Acrobat Viewer to see the handout's images in detail

Lab4   DC Motor Speed Control


Lab5   DC Motor Position Control


Lab 6 System Identification


 

MEG 421L Control Lab #7 - CE 117 Process Trainer part 1 Flow control Valve

MEG 421L Control Lab #8 - CE 117 Process Trainer part 2 Flow control Pump

  Lab 9:   Pendulum Gantry control and Lab 9 supplement

  Lab 10:   Upright pendulum control and Pendulum supplemental  Lab 10 Handout. The pendulum experiments are meant to demonstrate advanced concepts which are beyond the scope to the MEG 421 course, namely state variable control and optimal (Linear Quadratic Regulator) control. The theory for these two experiments is covered in chapter 7.3 (Pole Placement). You are not required to understand the underlying theory in detail. The pole placement concept permits the control system designer to choose the closed loop poles (almost) arbitrarily. The optimal controller for the upright pendulum is also a state controller, now optimized to meet user-specified quality criteria (typically: minimal errors for the important state variables.
 


 
 


 

Example: Design of a lead compensator using Bode techniques. This example employs the command files for Lead compensator design contained in MEG 421L Control Lab #13 The plant is given as:

 
 G(s) = 10/[s(s + 1)(s + 5)].


The plant Bode plot is shown in the postscript file: leadplant.pdf. In our example, we specify a desired phase margin of 30 degrees. Therefore, we must place the gain crossover frequency such that the phase angle is -150 degrees or more at the Gain=1 crossing. As we can quickly see in leadplant.pdf, a P-controller would have a gain of about K = 1. We can do a lot better with lead compensation.

All lead compensators in this example have a ratio pole/zero = 10, and a unity steady-state gain. The lead compensator must be FAST in order to be effective. The design command file of Lab 13 prompts you for the 'desired gain crossover frequency' that is, the frequency at which we wish to cross the Gain = 1 or 0 dB axis in the Magnitude plot. The command file places this frequency at the geometrical CENTER = Sqrt(p*z) of the Lead compensator! The three following files demonstrate the effect of designing a lead compensator for gain crossover frequencies of 1 rad/s leadcomp1.pdf. 2 rad/s, leadcomp2.pdf. , and 3 rad/s, leadcomp3.pdf. Clearly, the FASTER the compensator, the better the performance as measured by the ability to raise the loop gain K. The fastest and best compensator in this example raises the loop gain by 22 dB or a factor of 12.6. Compare this with a simple P-controller that would give us a gain of K = 1 only!

We cannot make the lead compensator too fast, though, lest we lose some of its benefits. We'll settle for a center frequency of 3 rad/s here. Lastly, we must raise the compensator gain so that the gain crossover is at the desired phase margin of 150 degrees. The amount of gain increase possible is already indicated in leadcomp3.pdf as K = 12.5. After increasing the gain K (using the Lab 13 command file), we can view the final design in leadcompfin.pdf.